Skip to content
FinOps is a set of cloud financial management practices that enable collaboration across Engineering, Finance, Product, and Business teams to manage cloud costs. It focuses on gaining financial visibility, optimizing cloud spending, and improving resource ROI while supporting faster product delivery.
As organizations scale their cloud usage, managing costs and implementing FinOps practices can become complex. Tracking cloud spend, allocating costs, and ensuring financial accountability can quickly become complex and time-consuming, requiring coordinating among multiple teams. Hence, the need for FinOps as a service.
In this article, we’ll break down what FinOps as a service is, how it works, the pros and cons, as well as best practices for implementing it.
What is FinOps as a Service?
FinOps as a service refers to a service, platform, set of tools, or combination that helps organizations implement FinOps practices without having to build everything in-house.
FinOps as a Service leverages intelligent analytics and industry expertise to automate and optimize cloud spend. It also helps consolidate financial, usage, and operational data across multiple accounts, services, and clouds into a single platform. This eliminates the need for manual data aggregation and reconciliation — a key challenge for organizations as they scale up.
The goal is to improve cloud management through visibility, optimization, and governance while reducing the operational effort required from internal teams.
Core functions of FinOps as a Service
| Inform | Optimize | Operate |
● Cost Visibility — get detailed info on which services, products, items, etc. drive costs ● Cost Allocation & Chargeback – assign costs to teams, projects, or business units to ensure accountability ● Real-Time Cost Monitoring & Anomaly Detection – Continuously track cloud expenses to catch overspending before it becomes a major issue ● Forecasting & Budgeting – Predict cloud spend and align it with financial planning ● Unit Economics & Benchmarking – Measure cost efficiency per user, workload, transaction, etc. to improve margins ● Cost & Revenue Analysis – Track cloud costs in relation to revenue, unit economics, and COGS to assess profitability | ● Rightsizing & Auto Scaling – Adjust compute resources to match actual usage, eliminating over-provisioning ● Commitment & Discount Management – Optimize Reserved Instances, Savings Plans, and Spot Instances ● Storage & Data Transfer Optimization – Reduce unnecessary data movement and storage costs with intelligent policies ● Scheduling of resources to turn off when you’re not using them and maximize the value of your cloud investments ● Policy-Driven Cost Controls – Implement automated cost controls that enforce spending limits and best practices. | ● Cloud Financial Automation – Set up automated optimizations for compute, storage, and networking. ● FinOps Reporting & Compliance – Generate auditable reports to track cloud cost efficiency and regulatory compliance. ● Cross-Team Collaboration & Governance – Ensure finance and engineering teams communicate effectively about cost implications. ● Workload Optimization – Dynamically place workloads in the most cost-efficient regions or environments. ● Sustainable Cloud Practices – Reduce unnecessary resource consumption |
Inform — A FinOps platform can help you access detailed, real-time cloud cost data, so teams don’t need to spend time manually integrating data from multiple sources or building complex monitoring systems. With cost visibility, tagging, allocation and monitoring tools, it becomes easier to track which services are driving costs.
Optimize — Organizations can automate key processes like rightsizing and discount optimization, ensuring cloud resources are always optimized for cost-efficiency without requiring constant manual intervention. This reduces the burden on engineering teams, while allowing for proactive, continuous optimization at scale. The objective is more predictable cloud spend and fewer missed opportunities for savings.
Operate: FinOps as a service can help significantly reduce operational overhead. Automation handles everything from financial reporting to cross-team collaboration, ensuring that internal teams aren’t bogged down with manual tasks. Governance and compliance are more seamlessly integrated into day-to-day cloud operations, and ongoing cost optimization happens in the background. This means teams can focus on building and innovating.
Best practices for implementing Cloud FinOps as a Service
1. Choosing the Right Approach: In-House vs. FinOps Platform vs. Outsource
When deciding between building in-house, outsourcing to consulting firms, or adopting a FinOps platform, consider that in-house solutions require dedicated resources and expertise, while outsourcing provides access to expert consultants for tailored advice, and FinOps as a Service offers a hybrid model, supporting your existing team with platform-driven automation and support for ongoing optimization.
The optimal approach for your team depends on multiple factors, such as:
- Company size & growth stage: Small startups vs. mid-market vs. enterprises.
- Cloud spend size: Low spend (<$10K/month) vs. moderate spend ($10K-$500K/month) vs. high spend (> $1M/month).
- Team expertise: Whether your team has dedicated cloud financial roles, has cloud cost knowledge, dedicated FinOps professionals.
- Current cost challenges:Includes lack of visibility, inconsistent costs, cloud waste, complex environments, unused commitments, surprise bills, etc.
- Complexity of cloud infrastructure: Simple, single-cloud environments, complex multi-cloud environments, large-scale hybrid architectures, etc.
- Other factors including your organization’s priorities, budget, skillset, timing, etc.
| Approach | Pros | Cons | Comments | |
| Dedicated FinOps Team (In-House Experts) | – Deep integration with engineering & finance teams – Tailored FinOps strategy – Full control over optimization efforts | – Finding the right resources with the right skillset is very difficult and expensive – Both direct and indirect cost of hiring & retaining specialists – Slower to implement FinOps maturity | Strongly aligned with FinOps principles—ensures cost accountability, collaboration, and long-term maturity. Best for large-scale cloud users with complex environments | |
| Empower Engineering Teams with FinOps Automations (e.g., nOps) | – Automates cost visibility & optimization – Reduces manual work for engineers – Faster adoption compared to hiring a team | – Engineers still need to engage in cost management – Requires proper governance to ensure accountability | Aligns well with FinOps goals if combined with strong governance. Helps engineers take ownership of cost efficiency without requiring a dedicated FinOps team | |
| Fully Outsource FinOps to a Managed Service Provider (MSP) | – Immediate cost optimization – No internal expertise needed – Offloads complexity of cloud cost management | – Loss of cost ownership & internal FinOps maturity – MSP may not align with internal priorities – Potential vendor lock-in | The least aligned with FinOps principles. While it can provide short-term relief, it risks weakening cross-functional collaboration and cost accountability. Best suited as a temporary measure or for companies with no internal bandwidth | |
2. Ensure Cost Allocation & Accountability
According to the FinOps foundation, FinOps isn’t just about cost-cutting — it’s about accountability. As such, it’s important to ensure a FinOps platform allows for granular cost allocation. This means the ability to tag cloud resources, assign costs to specific accounts or business units, and provide clear visibility into which teams or projects are driving cloud spend. Chargeback allows you to allocate the cost of cloud services directly to the teams that use them, while showback provides visibility into usage without immediate cost transfer.
Additionally, choose tools that support shared cost splitting for services like Kubernetes or multi-cloud workloads. This ensures that costs are appropriately divided between different teams or services, even when resources are shared across multiple environments.
3. Integrate FinOps Tools Into Engineering Workflows
FinOps must be a collaboration between Finance, Engineering and Business Teams. As such, it’s key to select a FinOps service that integrates seamlessly with engineering workflows — for example, through tools like Slack, Jira, or Terraform. This ensures engineers have the right cloud cost data within the tools they already use, enabling them to take immediate action without needing to switch between platforms. Avoid services that only cater to finance teams and don’t provide actionable recommendations for engineers. Engineers should be empowered to act on cloud cost data, not just monitor it passively.
Additionally, make sure the service provides real-time anomaly detection and proactive alerts, allowing engineers to identify and address issues before they lead to overspending.
4. Focus on Automated Optimization with Guardrails
When implementing FinOps as a service, automated optimization is key, but it should be coupled with human oversight to avoid costly mistakes. Ensure the service provides automated recommendations for rightsizing, discount management, and storage efficiency to help reduce waste without requiring manual intervention.
Make sure you can set cost guardrails and policies to prevent unnecessary spending, such as blocking expensive on-demand usage when cheaper alternatives like Reserved Instances or Spot Instances are available. These guardrails should align with your organization’s financial goals, preventing overspending while optimizing cloud resources.
Also, look for policy-based automation that follows FinOps tagging standards. This ensures that cost optimization remains in line with business priorities and prevents unintended over-optimization, which could lead to performance degradation or other negative effects.
5. Ensure Continuous Improvement & Benchmarking
FinOps is an ongoing practice, not a one-time project. Choose a service that enables you to track key performance indicators (KPIs) over time, such as cost per workload, percentage of waste reduced, and forecasting accuracy. This allows you to measure progress and continuously refine your cost optimization strategies.
Look for benchmarking features that let you compare your cloud costs to industry peers, helping you identify areas where you can improve efficiency and remain competitive.
Additionally, ensure the service supports regular FinOps reporting and governance reviews, allowing you to assess cloud cost optimization on a continuous basis. This ensures that your FinOps practices stay aligned with evolving business needs and maintain long-term cost effectiveness.
6. nOps: everything you need in one FinOps platform
Key FinOps features include:
- Business Contexts: understand 100% of your AWS costs with automated dashboards, reports, container cost allocation, budgets & cost tracking, and more
- Commitment Management: automatic life-cycle management of your AWS Reserved Instances and Savings Plans with the industry’s only 100% utilization guarantee
- nOps Essentials: automate time-consuming cloud optimization tasks like pausing idle resources, scheduling resources, optimizing storage, etc.
- Compute Copilot: automatically optimizes your compute resources end-to-end, reducing waste at the container, node and pricing level with complete Kubernetes visibility
- AWS MAP Tracker: maximizes MAP funding, automatically tags resources, and tracks credits for efficient cloud migration
You can book a demo to try out these G2 5-star rated features with your own AWS account.
nOps was recently ranked #1 with five stars in G2’s cloud cost management category, and we optimize $2 billion in cloud spend for our FinOps customers.
