Cloud cost optimization platforms take very different approaches to solving the same problem: how to maximize savings while maintaining visibility and control. Some focus on automating commitments, others on analytics and guidance—and a few aim to do both.

ProsperOps, DoiT, and nOps are three of the leading solutions in this space. ProsperOps specializes in automated commitment management, continuously adjusting Savings Plans and Reserved Instances to capture maximum savings. DoiT centers on visibility and expert FinOps support, helping teams understand and manage spend across multiple clouds. nOps combines automation and visibility, integrating real-time commitment management into a broader cost optimization and operations platform.

This guide breaks down the difference between DoiT vs ProsperOps vs nOps—and how to decide which approach best fits your organization’s cloud strategy.

What is DoiT?

DoiT is a multicloud FinOps and cloud operations platform designed to help organizations gain clarity over their public-cloud spend, infrastructure usage, and performance. It emphasises visibility, analytics, governance, and expert support, especially in complex cloud environments spanning AWS, Google Cloud and Azure.

Key Features

  • Unified cost visibility across AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure with detailed cost allocation and trend analysis.

  • Real-time anomaly detection for usage or spend spikes.

  • Built-in recommendations for rightsizing, resource efficiency, and budgeting.

  • Cloud architecture diagrams and performance dashboards to visualize infrastructure and costs.

  • Integrations with tools like Slack, Teams, and Zapier for automated alerts and workflows.

  • Dedicated FinOps and cloud engineering experts available for consultative support.

Strengths

  • Good for companies that prioritize visibility, accountability, and guided decision-making over automated optimization.

  • Strong multicloud coverage with deep analytics and customizable dashboards.

  • The combination of platform + expert support creates a high-touch experience for teams that want help interpreting data

  • Valuable for organizations scaling across multiple clouds or with complex business units that need chargeback/showback reporting.

Weaknesses

  • DoiT’s platform is not deeply automated — it surfaces insights and recommendations but leaves execution (buying, resizing, rebalancing commitments) to the user.

  • Because the system depends heavily on human FinOps guidance, its value scales with engagement. Teams without time to meet regularly with DoiT experts may underutilize it.

  • Limited focus on proactive savings automation compared to tools like nOps or ProsperOps, which can translate to slower time-to-impact for purely financial outcomes.

  • The pricing model is opaque, typically quote-based and bundled with services, which makes it hard to benchmark against simpler SaaS pricing.

  • Some users note that data refreshes and dashboard loads can lag for very large cloud footprints, making real-time decisions harder at scale.

What is ProsperOps?

ProsperOps is a fully-automated cloud cost optimization platform designed to continuously align your committed cloud spend (Reserved Instances, Savings Plans) with actual usage. It aims to reduce wasted commitments, minimize risk of over-committing, and free up engineering/FinOps teams from manual savings-plan management.

Key Features

  • Autonomous management of cloud commitments: automatically ladders and adjusts Reserved Instances and Savings Plans based on usage shifts.

  • Machine-learning-driven forecasting and alignment of commitments to actual workloads.

  • Dashboarding of effective savings rate, unused commitments risk, and net savings delivered over time.

  • Multi-cloud support expanding beyond AWS into Azure and Google Cloud in recent releases.

  • Minimal manual input after setup — once the rules are configured, the system handles ongoing optimization.

Strengths

  • Strong automation focus: especially useful for teams that want “set-it and forget-it” commitment management.

  • Proven savings outcomes: many users report meaningful reduction in cloud cost waste and improved utilization of committed spend.

  • Fast onboarding: reviewers note relatively quick time to value and minimal day-to-day operational overhead once live.

  • Specialized expertise: built by practitioners with deep background in cloud cost engineering and commitments management

Weaknesses

  • Only solves one piece of the FinOps equation—automated commitment management—without addressing broader cost visibility, governance, or workload optimization.

  • There’s no public pricing page, and costs are typically quote-based, making budgeting and ROI modeling harder for smaller teams or early-stage programs.

  • The value proposition depends on having a large, stable base of committed cloud spend; smaller or highly variable workloads see less impact.

  • The platform’s API and integration ecosystem are relatively limited compared to more general-purpose FinOps tools, which can make extensibility a challenge for advanced teams.

What is nOps?

nOps is a cloud cost optimization and visibility platform that unifies visibility, analytics, commitment management, and automated optimization in one system. It’s designed for finance, engineering, and FinOps teams that want both real-time visibility and active cost reduction.

Key Features

  • Real-time visibility across AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, SaaS, and GenAI workloads, with hourly cost and usage tracking.

  • Cost allocation without perfect tagging, automating showback and chargeback through metadata such as account, environment, or usage type.

  • Forecasting and anomaly detection powered by time-series ML, helping predict cost trajectories and flag spend deviations before they escalate.

  • Commitment management that guarantees 100% utilization, automatically rebalancing Savings Plans and RIs to match usage in real time.

  • EKS and storage optimization with automated rightsizing and resource scheduling for containerized and persistent workloads.

  • Integrated dashboards and reports built by FinOps practitioners, with 40+ prebuilt filters and customizable templates for engineering, finance, and executives.

  • AI-powered FinOps assistant (“Clara”) for natural-language queries and insights without manual dashboards.

Strengths

  • Combines end-to-end FinOps capabilities—from analysis and allocation to optimization and automation—in one platform.

  • High automation coverage: actively manages commitments, rebalances in real time, and guarantees utilization, reducing manual FinOps effort.

  • Broad integrations: supports multi-cloud, Kubernetes, SaaS, and AI workloads with consistent visibility.

  • Quick setup and adoption: onboarding typically takes under five minutes with no infrastructure changes required.

  • Data-driven focus: prebuilt dashboards and ML forecasting give engineering and finance shared context on spend drivers and savings opportunities.

  • Savings-first pricing model: nOps only charges a percentage of realized savings, minimizing financial risk and aligning incentives.

Weaknesses

  • Strongest optimization capabilities are centered on AWS, while visibility for Azure, GCP, and SaaS workloads is available but still lighter in optimization depth.

  • The platform’s breadth can feel extensive for smaller teams that only need cost reporting rather than full automation and forecasting.

ProsperOps vs DoiT vs nOps

ProsperOps, DoiT and nOps have some important distinctions in their approach to cloud visibility and optimization, the guarantees they offer, and features included in the platform.

Let’s briefly compare ProsperOps vs nOps vs DoiT:

FeaturenOpsProsperOpsDoiT
Commitment Management   
Fully automated management of RIs and Savings Plans✅✅⚪ (advisory only)
Commitment monitoring & visibility✅✅✅
100% utilization guarantee (or refund of fee)✅❌❌
Fee structure aligns incentives with customer (savings-based pricing)✅✅❌
Official AWS partner✅✅✅
Coverage of AWS, Azure, and GCP⚪ (Optimization primarily AWS; visibility multi-cloud)⚪ (Primarily AWS)✅ (Strong AWS & GCP, growing Azure)
Automation & Optimization   
Real-time workload management and rebalancing✅✅ (periodic)❌
Intelligent instance and commitment selection✅✅❌
Commitment-aware Spot management✅❌❌
Kubernetes optimization and container rightsizing✅❌⚪ (visibility only)
Storage and EBS optimization✅❌❌
Resource scheduling and idle resource elimination✅❌❌
Visibility, Reporting, Budgets & Dashboards   
Unified cost visibility across cloud, SaaS, and AI workloads✅⚪ (commitments only)✅
Cost allocation without perfect tagging✅❌⚪ (manual or partial)
Forecasting & anomaly detection✅⚪✅
Reports & dashboards✅✅✅
Budget management and chargebacks✅❌✅
Prebuilt FinOps reports and KPI templates✅❌✅
GenAI cost visibility and optimization✅❌⚪ (limited insights only)
Pricing & Value Model   
Pricing model% of realized savings% of realized savingsSubscription / usage-based
Setup time< 5 minutes< 1 hourCustom engagement
Best suited forTeams wanting end-to-end automation & visibilityTeams focused solely on commitment savingsTeams needing analytics, governance & FinOps guidance

Why Choose nOps over Doit and ProsperOps?

nOps stands out by combining the automation depth of ProsperOps with the visibility and intelligence of DoiT, delivering both immediate savings and long-term operational control. Where ProsperOps focuses narrowly on AWS commitment management and DoiT emphasizes analytics and advisory services, nOps integrates these capabilities into a single, autonomous FinOps platform.

Unlike ProsperOps, nOps doesn’t stop at commitments — it continuously optimizes across compute, storage, Kubernetes, and GenAI workloads, guaranteeing 100% utilization of managed commitments and crediting back any unused capacity. It also extends beyond AWS, providing multi-cloud visibility and cost allocation across Azure, GCP, SaaS, and Kubernetes environments.

nOps’ savings-based pricing model aligns its incentives with yours: you only pay when the platform saves you money. That, combined with fast onboarding (minutes, not weeks) and proven results across $2B+ in managed AWS spend, makes nOps the most complete solution for organizations ready to automate FinOps while maintaining full visibility and control.

nOps was recently ranked #1 in G2’s cloud cost management category – try it out for yourself with a demo today!

Demo

AI-Powered Cost Management Platform

Discover how much you can save in just 10 minutes!

Book a Demo

Frequently Asked Questions

Let’s dive into some FAQ about ProsperOps, DoiT vs nOps comparison. 

1. Why do SaaS companies struggle with unpredictable AWS bills?

SaaS companies often face dynamic, usage-driven workloads that fluctuate by customer activity and product demand. Without real-time visibility or automated optimization, these shifts cause billing surprises. Complex pricing models, incomplete tagging, and rapidly scaling microservices make it difficult to predict, allocate, and control AWS spending accurately.

2. How can SaaS teams ensure cloud cost growth matches business growth?

They need continuous cost allocation tied to business metrics—like cost per user, feature, or API call. Tools like nOps align financial data with product usage, enabling teams to track efficiency and ensure cloud spend scales proportionally with revenue, not just infrastructure activity.

3. How do SaaS companies eliminate cloud waste?

By combining granular visibility with automated actions. nOps detects idle resources, over-provisioned instances, and underused storage, then automatically rightsizes or schedules them off. This proactive optimization removes waste before it impacts budgets, freeing engineering hours and improving cost efficiency without disrupting workloads.

4. Why are legacy FinOps tools ineffective for SaaS workloads?

Legacy tools rely on static tagging and manual reporting, which can’t handle dynamic, containerized, or AI-driven SaaS environments. Modern workloads change hourly, so teams need automated allocation, Kubernetes visibility, and real-time forecasting—capabilities traditional dashboards and spreadsheets weren’t built to deliver.

5. Can SaaS companies optimize AWS Savings Plans safely with variable workloads?

Yes. nOps automates Savings Plan management using AI that adjusts commitments in real time as workloads change. This ensures coverage and savings without overcommitting, even for spiky or seasonal usage patterns—guaranteeing 100% utilization or crediting back unused capacity.

6. Does nOps support multi-cloud SaaS environments?

Yes. nOps provides unified cost visibility across AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and SaaS workloads. While deep optimization is strongest on AWS, the platform delivers consistent analysis, allocation, and reporting across clouds, enabling SaaS teams to manage multi-cloud operations from a single dashboard.

7. What makes nOps pricing better suited for SaaS businesses?

nOps uses a savings-based pricing model—you only pay a percentage of what the platform saves you. This aligns perfectly with SaaS economics, reducing risk, eliminating upfront costs, and ensuring expenses scale directly with value delivered, not with usage or seat counts.

8. How fast can SaaS teams start optimizing with nOps?

nOps connects to AWS in minutes, requires no infrastructure changes, and begins analyzing data within 24 hours. Most teams start identifying savings opportunities immediately and achieve measurable cost reductions within the first week, making onboarding exceptionally fast and low-effort.