Skip to content
- On-Demand vs Spot vs Reserved Instances: Explained in 2025
On-Demand vs Spot vs Reserved Instances: Explained in 2025
Cloud compute pricing is all about trade-offs — flexibility versus savings, reliability versus risk. AWS offers three main ways to pay for EC2 capacity: On-Demand (maximum flexibility, highest price), Reserved (lower cost for long-term commitment), and Spot (deep discounts for interruptible workloads). The right mix determines how efficiently you use your infrastructure — and how much you actually save.
This guide breaks down each option in clear terms: what it is, where it excels, and what to watch out for. You’ll see a detailed side-by-side comparison covering cost, risk, availability, predictability, scalability, and workload fit — followed by simple rules of thumb for when to choose each type.
The goal is straightforward: help you understand how to balance Spot instances vs On Demand vs Reserved instances to get the most performance per dollar, without sacrificing reliability or flexibility.
On-Demand Instances
On-Demand Instances are AWS’s default pricing model — pay only for the compute you use, billed per second or hour, with no long-term commitment. They’re perfect for workloads that are unpredictable or short-lived, like development environments, testing, or temporary projects where flexibility matters more than savings.
Because you can launch or terminate instances anytime, On-Demand gives you total control over your infrastructure. The trade-off is cost: this flexibility comes at a premium, making On-Demand the most expensive option over time.
Best for:
Short-lived, unpredictable workloads; early-stage experiments; performance benchmarking; or temporary spikes beyond your reserved or committed capacity. Use it when agility matters more than cost savings.
On-Demand Instances Pros
Ultimate flexibility. Start or stop instances at any time — no lock-in or forecasting required.
Instant capacity. Always available in supported regions without waiting for commitments to activate.
Simple billing. Pay only for what you actually use, with per-second or per-hour granularity.
Low management overhead. No need to track utilization or manage exchanges.
On-Demand Instances Cons
Highest unit cost. You pay a premium for flexibility compared to Reserved or Spot pricing.
No long-term discount. Costs add up quickly for workloads running 24/7.
Unpredictable monthly bills. Variable usage can make budgeting and forecasting difficult.
Not cost-efficient for steady workloads. Continuous usage is better covered by Reserved or Savings Plans.
Reserved Instances
Reserved Instances (RIs) are AWS’s commitment-based pricing model designed for predictable, long-running workloads. Instead of paying On-Demand rates, you commit to a specific instance type and region for a one- or three-year term — and in return, you can save up to 75% compared to On-Demand pricing.
There are two main types of RIs: Standard and Convertible. Standard RIs offer the deepest discounts but require the highest level of commitment — you’re locked into your instance family, operating system, and region for the full term. Convertible RIs, on the other hand, trade a small amount of savings for flexibility. You can exchange them mid-term for different instance families, operating systems, or tenancies, as long as the new RI is of equal or greater value.
In practice, most organizations use a blend of both. Standard RIs provide a reliable cost floor for workloads that never change — such as databases or production web servers — while Convertible RIs cover evolving workloads that may need to scale, switch architectures, or adopt new instance families over time.
By planning RI coverage strategically, teams can achieve deep, predictable savings without giving up the adaptability that the cloud promises. However, RIs require accurate forecasting and active management — particularly for large environments or fast-growing organizations where usage patterns shift frequently.
Best For
Steady-state workloads that run continuously and rarely change configuration — like production databases, application servers, or analytics clusters. Convertible RIs are best for teams that want long-term discounts but expect to evolve their infrastructure over time.
Pros of Reserved Instances
Deep discounts. Up to ~75% vs On-Demand for long-running workloads (highest with Standard RIs).
Predictable spend. Fixed-rate coverage over 1–3 years makes budgeting straightforward.
Capacity options. Zonal RIs can reserve capacity in a specific AZ; Regional RIs offer flexible placement.
Broad service coverage. Available beyond EC2 (e.g., RDS, ElastiCache, Redshift, DynamoDB, OpenSearch).
Convertible flexibility. CRIs let you exchange to new families/sizes/OS/tenancy mid-term (equal or greater value) without resetting the end date.
Exit hatch (Standard). In many cases you can resell unused Standard RIs on the RI Marketplace (with restrictions).
Cons of Reserved Instances
Forecasting risk. Miss the usage forecast and you pay for under-utilized commitments.
Less flexible (Standard). Locked to family/region/OS; changes require resale rather than exchange.
Management overhead. Large estates need active tracking, coverage tuning, and renewal/exchange workflows.
Term lock-in. 1–3 year commitments reduce agility if demand drops or architectures shift.
Marketplace caveats. Standard RI resale is limited (e.g., not within first/last 30 days; some discounted/EDP purchases aren’t eligible).
Scope constraints. Zonal vs Regional choices trade capacity assurance for placement flexibility; picking wrong adds friction.
Spot Instances
Spot Instances let you take advantage of AWS’s unused compute capacity at steep discounts — often up to 90% cheaper than On-Demand pricing. The trade-off: AWS can reclaim those instances with just a two-minute warning when the capacity is needed elsewhere.
That makes Spot ideal for workloads that can handle interruptions or automatically retry without data loss. It’s not about replacing your production baseline — it’s about stretching your compute budget for parallel, fault-tolerant, or non-urgent jobs. Teams that design for resiliency can run at scale for a fraction of the cost, especially when using tools like EC2 Fleet, Auto Scaling Groups, or Karpenter to diversify instance pools and handle replacements automatically.
Best For
Pros of Spot Instances
Massive savings. Up to 90% cheaper than On-Demand, ideal for scaling compute-intensive workloads affordably.
Great for parallel jobs. Perfect for distributed or batch workloads that can restart or checkpoint progress.
Highly elastic. Scale up or down instantly when capacity is available, ideal for variable workloads.
Integrates with automation. Works seamlessly with Auto Scaling Groups, EC2 Fleet, and Karpenter to handle interruptions automatically.
Cons of Spot Instances
Interruption risk. AWS can reclaim instances with a two-minute warning, so workloads must be resilient.
Limited availability. Certain instance types or regions may have inconsistent capacity.
No guaranteed uptime. Unsuitable for critical or stateful production workloads without fallback coverage.
Operational complexity. Requires automation or orchestration (like checkpointing, retries, or mixed-instance strategies) to manage interruptions effectively.
Price variability. Spot prices fluctuate based on regional demand, requiring monitoring or automation for stability.
Detailed Comparison: On-Demand vs Spot vs Reserved Instances
Let’s sum it up by comparing the differences across key dimensions for On Demand Instances vs Spot instances vs Reserved.
| Feature | On-Demand | Spot | Reserved (Standard / Convertible) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost / Discount | Highest cost; pay full price per hour or second. | Deepest discounts — up to 90% off On-Demand. | Up to 75% savings vs On-Demand (Standard); ~60–68% for Convertible. |
| Commitment / Risk | No commitment or risk — pay as you go. | No commitment but high interruption risk; AWS can reclaim instances anytime. | 1- or 3-year commitment; low operational risk if workloads are stable. |
| Availability / Reliability | Always available and stable capacity. | Capacity fluctuates; interruptions possible. | Guaranteed capacity (Zonal) or flexible regional coverage. |
| Predictability (Billing) | Variable billing — cost fluctuates with usage. | Variable pricing based on market demand. | Fixed, predictable cost over the term. |
| Flexibility / Scalability | Very flexible — start or stop anytime. | Highly scalable — great for bursts, but requires automation. | Limited (Standard) or moderate (Convertible) flexibility; suitable for steady workloads. |
| Best for Workloads | Short-term, unpredictable, or new workloads. | Fault-tolerant, stateless, or batch jobs (CI/CD, analytics, ML). | Long-running, steady-state production workloads. |
When to Use Which Instance Type?
To sum it up:
Use On-Demand for unpredictable or short-term workloads — such as testing, development, or temporary projects — and for burst scaling beyond your reserved capacity when flexibility matters most.
Use Reserved (or committed) for steady-state workloads that run continuously over 1–3 years. This ensures predictable costs and the highest long-term savings.
Use Spot for noncritical, fault-tolerant, or batch workloads where interruptions are acceptable — the cheapest way to scale compute-intensive jobs.
Automatically Optimize On-Demand, Reserved, and Spot with nOps
Balancing On-Demand, Reserved, and Spot Instances manually is difficult — usage shifts daily, Spot capacity fluctuates, and commitments need constant tuning to avoid waste. nOps automates this entire process, ensuring every dollar of compute spend goes to the right pricing model at the right time.
Here’s how nOps helps you stay optimized:
More Cost Savings: Continuously analyzes your workloads and automatically blends On-Demand, Reserved, and Spot usage for the best possible effective rate.
Zero Overhead: Integrates directly with AWS APIs to manage commitments, monitor Spot availability, and right-size instances — no spreadsheets or manual adjustments.
Complete Visibility: See exactly how much of your spend is covered by commitments, Spot, or On-Demand in real time with continuous optimization reports.
nOps was recently ranked #1 with five stars in G2’s Cloud Cost Management category, and we currently optimize over $2 billion in AWS spend for our customers.
Join teams using nOps to automate their AWS pricing mix and capture every available savings opportunity — while freeing engineers to focus on building and innovating rather than pricing models.
Frequently Asked Questions
Let’s dive into some FAQ about AWS Spot instances vs On Demand vs Reserved instances.
What are the three types of EC2 instances?
AWS offers three main EC2 pricing models: On-Demand, Reserved, and Spot Instances. On-Demand provides flexibility with pay-as-you-go pricing, Reserved offers lower costs with term commitments, and Spot delivers steep discounts for workloads that can tolerate interruptions.
What is the difference between Azure Spot and Reserved Instances?
Azure Spot Instances offer spare capacity at deep discounts but can be reclaimed anytime. Reserved Instances, in contrast, require a one- or three-year commitment in exchange for lower, predictable pricing — ideal for steady workloads rather than fault-tolerant or disposable ones.
Is Spot cheaper than Reserved?
Yes — Spot Instances are typically 70–90% cheaper than On-Demand and often more affordable than Reserved pricing. However, Spot capacity can be interrupted at any time, making it best suited for batch jobs, fault-tolerant workloads, or non-critical compute tasks.
How much are Spot Instances compared to On-Demand?
Spot Instances can cost up to 90% less than On-Demand pricing, depending on AWS capacity and region. Prices fluctuate based on supply and demand for spare compute resources, offering exceptional savings for workloads that can handle potential interruptions.
